Bill Statistics

The Middle Class Position

The middle class supports.

How They Voted

43% with middle class
55% against middle class
3% did not vote
Pie Chart

Grades

Grade D
House

The House receives a grade of D for its support of the middle class on this piece of legislation.

188 Representatives voted for the middle-class position; 240 voted against.

H.AMDT. 534 TO H.R. 4173

Amendment #534 (Mortgage “Cramdown” Amendment) to Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009

Introduced:
12.11.2009 [House]
House: Yea-188, Nay-240
The Legislation: 

Amendment #534 authorizes bankruptcy courts to modify the terms of mortgages made on homeowners’ primary residences, a practice which is barred by current law. The amendment would permit bankruptcy courts to restructure the debt on home mortgages by reducing the principal owed, extending repayment periods, reducing interest rates, and prohibiting, reducing, or delaying future interest rate increases. Bankruptcy law currently permits such restructuring only for vacation homes, family farms, and yachts. Under this legislation, eligibility is limited to homeowners with mortgages originated before the enactment of the amendment who have received notice that a foreclosure may be commenced. The legislation restricts the situations in which bankruptcy judges can reduce – or “cramdown” – the principal owed.

To be eligible for modification in bankruptcy, a mortgage holder must contact the lender regarding modification through the President’s Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan – and consider such modification – at least 30 days before a bankruptcy case begins. If a bankruptcy court reduces a mortgage’s principal and the value of the home later rises, the lender is entitled to receive a portion of the net proceeds from sale of the property. The amendment waives the current requirement for budget and credit counseling when homes are in foreclosure, protects homeowners from certain fees incurred while a bankruptcy is pending, and permits bankruptcy courts to wave penalties on homeowners who pay their mortgages in full ahead of schedule. The legislation allows the Federal Housing Authority (FHA) to pay insurance claims on FHA-insured mortgages that are modified in bankruptcy. The FHA is also authorized to carry out its own mortgage modification program.

The Middle-Class Position: 

The Middle Class Supports. Even as the economy has stabilized in recent months, the housing and job markets have worsened, middle-class families have continued to lose equity in their homes, and households are less able to afford abusive mortgages with exorbitant interest rates. The federal government and the mortgage industry’s continued failure to address the subprime mortgage and foreclosure crisis adequately could result in as many as 13 million foreclosures during the next 5 years. Despite widespread calls for action to confront the crisis, foreclosures increased 81% in 2008. Although the administration’s Home Affordable Modification Program seeks to modify 3-4 million mortgages, only 4 percent of the 700,000 trial modifications made so far have been made permanent. Voluntary mortgage modifications by lenders and banks, encouraged by policymakers in place of comprehensive federal action, have failed to make mortgages more affordable and prevent widespread foreclosures.

Extending the same bankruptcy protections to primary residences that currently apply to luxury yachts and vacation homes is not only fair, but will reduce foreclosures by about 20%, according to Credit Suisse, and benefit about 800,000 households, according to the Center for Responsible Lending. Strengthened bankruptcy protection is also beneficial to middle-class families who are not themselves facing foreclosure: foreclosures in 2009 will result in a $502 billion decline in property values for homes in neighborhoods surrounding those foreclosures, with an average decrease in property value per home of $7,200. Preventing foreclosures in those neighborhoods will keep property values up, benefiting all households. Indeed, an analysis by the Center for Responsible Lending found that similar legislation would avoid 600,000 foreclosures and thus maintain $72.5 billion in wealth for families not facing foreclosure. Modification of mortgages in bankruptcy will help maintain property values, while keeping middle-class families in their homes, limiting the self-reinforcing spiral of foreclosures and falling home prices.

Additionally, the bankruptcy provision provides a powerful incentive to banks to offer homeowners affordable loan modifications in order to avoid costly bankruptcy proceedings over which they have little control.

From the Experts: 

“There is ample evidence that the meltdown in the American housing market is not yet over, and experts warn that a rise in home foreclosures next year and into 2011 could undermine the chances of a sustained economic recovery. Voluntary programs are not working to reduce the problem. But the good news is that we [can] fix this problem without costing taxpayers a dime…[Amendment #201] will not excuse families from paying their mortgage. Rather, it simply will give judges the authority to modify unaffordable loans for families who are facing foreclosure and cannot obtain a voluntary modification. The clear objective of the amendment is to encourage the servicers of troubled homeowners to offer aggressive loan modifications that would help keep families in their homes, which, when compared to foreclosure, is more profitable to banks, more secure for the families, and more stable for the surrounding neighborhood and community.”
–Americans for Financial Reform (December 10, 2009)

“[B]ankruptcy law is wildly off-kilter in how it treats homeownership. Under current law, courts can lower unreasonably high interest rates on secured loans, reschedule secured loan payments to make them more affordable and adjust the secured portion of loans down to the fair market value of the underlying property -- all secured loans, that is, except those secured by the debtor's home. This gaping loophole threatens the most vulnerable with the loss of their most valuable assets -- their homes -- and leaves untouched their largest liabilities -- their mortgages.”
–Jack Kemp, President George H.W. Bush’s Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (January 29, 2008)

Beyond this Bill: 

Critics of modifying primary mortgages in bankruptcy worry that interest rates will rise as a result, that the federal government is bailing out irresponsible borrowers, and that the provision will encourage bankruptcy, overwhelming bankruptcy courts. None of the criticisms is valid. Restricting eligibility to current mortgages in danger of foreclosure means that future mortgages will not qualify for modification. Thus, lenders will not raise interest rates on future mortgages based on the risk of modification in bankruptcy. Indeed, research demonstrates that mortgage markets (and interest rates) are not, in fact, influenced by the risk of bankruptcy modification. Further, the bankruptcy modification provision will protect all homeowners from the current housing crisis by mitigating house price declines. Foreclosures affect not only the families who lose their homes but entire neighborhoods, as property values decline with the appearance of unkempt properties, abandoned homes, and increased crime. Finally, concerns that the modification provision will incentivize bankruptcy are exaggerated. Not only is the provision limited to current mortgages at risk of foreclosure, but bankruptcy itself is unpleasant, damaging credit and subjecting living expenses to court review.

Still, modification of mortgages in bankruptcy will not solve the housing crisis. Further action to address widespread foreclosures – including a moratorium on foreclosures and a mechanism to require modification of mortgages outside of bankruptcy – is necessary. President Obama’s Home Affordable Modification Program is an important component of such a comprehensive approach, but must do more to convert trial modifications into permanent ones.

The act restores some fairness to bankruptcy law, which was changed in 2005 to treat middle-class debtors more harshly. Further legislation is necessary to reform the worst provisions of that bill that make it harder for debtors to get a fresh start.

Maine New Hampshire Vermont Massachusetts Rhode Island Connecticut New York New Jersey Pennsylvania Delaware Maryland West Virginia North Carolina South Carolina Georgia Florida Alabama Mississippi Tennessee Virginia Kentucky Ohio Indiana Michigan Illinois Wisconsin Louisiana Arkansas Missouri Iowa Minnesota Oklahoma Kansas Nebraska South Dakota North Dakota Texas Colorado New Mexico Arizona Utah Wyoming Hawaii Alaska Montana Nevada Idaho California Oregon Washington