Bill Statistics

The Middle Class Position

The middle class opposes.

How They Voted

48% with middle class
52% against middle class
0% did not vote
Pie Chart

Grades

Grade D
Senate

The Senate receives a grade of D for its support of the middle class on this piece of legislation.

48 Senators voted for the middle-class position; 51 voted against.

S.AMDT. 873 TO S.CON.RES. 13

Estate Tax Cut Amendment of 2009

Introduced:
04.01.2009 [Senate]
Senate: Yea-51, Nay-48
The Legislation: 

The Estate Tax Cut Amendment decreases the maximum federal tax on estates to 35% and exempts estates of up to $5 million per individual from the tax. This amount is indexed for inflation.

The estate tax is a tax on the transfer of assets to a person’s heirs. Currently, the maximum federal tax is 45% and only estates of up to $3.5 million are exempt. The tax is currently set to expire in 2010, but return in 2011 with a $1 million exemption and a maximum tax rate of 60%.

The Middle-Class Position: 

Middle Class Opposes. The estate tax, the most progressive component of the federal tax code, applies only to Americans lucky enough to inherit substantial fortunes. In fact, only 0.6% of deaths result in taxable estates. By taxing inherited wealth, the tax preserves the American tradition of rewarding hard work, not inherited privilege and wealth. Although the amendment does not fully repeal the estate tax, as has been proposed in the past, the legislation would still cost approximately $442 billion over ten years compared to current law. This significant reduction in revenue would benefit only the wealthiest 3 of every 1,000 American estates worth millions of dollars. While conservatives argue that the estate tax harms small farms and business, very few such estates are subject to the tax.

The amendment would adversely affect aspiring middle-class and middle-class Americans by burdening them with more of the cost of public services while allowing accumulated wealth to be passed on for generations. Those who work for their money would be forced either to pick up a bigger share of the tax bill or to suffer cuts in services essential to middle-class families and communities.

From the Experts: 

“This proposal is both fiscally irresponsible — it would pave the way for a significant increase in long-term deficits and debt — and unnecessary to protect small businesses and farms, nearly all of which are already exempt from the tax under the 2009 estate tax rules, which President Obama has proposed to extend. The amendment also would lead to significant reductions in charitable contributions, while benefiting only the wealthiest 0.28 percent of estates.”
– Chuck Marr and Jason Levitis, Director of Federal Tax Policy and Senior Policy Analyst, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, April 3, 2009

“Dynastic wealth, the enemy of a meritocracy, is on the rise. Equality of opportunity has been on the decline. A progressive and meaningful estate tax is needed to curb the movement of a democracy toward a plutocracy.”
– Warren Buffet, Chairman and CEO, Berkshire Hathaway, November 14, 2007

Beyond this Bill: 

For years wealthy opponents of the estate tax have campaigned for its repeal. Although this amendment is an improvement over complete abolition, the legislation remains indicative of a tax code that is weighted against middle-class Americans and towards the superrich. Since 2001, the amount exempt from the estate tax has increased while the maximum tax rate has decreased. This means that aspiring middle-class and middle-class Americans face the possibility of an increasing tax burden and cuts in the public services they rely upon. Stabilization of the estate tax exemption and rate are only fair to those who must pay the tax; however, legislation should fix the exemption and the tax rate at levels that maintain the tax’s important revenue stream. The estate tax is an important contribution by the wealthy who have benefited most from the favorable social and economic conditions maintained by public policy.

Maine New Hampshire Vermont Massachusetts Rhode Island Connecticut New York New Jersey Pennsylvania Delaware Maryland West Virginia North Carolina South Carolina Georgia Florida Alabama Mississippi Tennessee Virginia Kentucky Ohio Indiana Michigan Illinois Wisconsin Louisiana Arkansas Missouri Iowa Minnesota Oklahoma Kansas Nebraska South Dakota North Dakota Texas Colorado New Mexico Arizona Utah Wyoming Hawaii Alaska Montana Nevada Idaho California Oregon Washington