Bill Statistics

The Middle Class Position

The middle class opposes.

How They Voted

43% with middle class
55% against middle class
2% did not vote
Pie Chart

Grades

Grade D
Senate

The Senate receives a grade of D for its support of the middle class on this piece of legislation.

43 Senators voted for the middle-class position; 55 voted against.

S.AMDT. 3861 TO S. 1955

Health Insurance Marketplace Modernization and Affordability Act of 2006

Introduced:
05.09.2006 [Senate]
Senate: Yea-55, Nay-43
This legislation required a 60-vote supermajority for passage.
The Legislation: 

The Health Insurance Marketplace Modernization and Affordability Act amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to allow companies to establish Small Business Health Plans (SBHPs). These group plans, which are intended to help small employers and the self-employed get a better deal in the health insurance marketplace by joining together, could be sponsored by trade, industry, professional, chamber of commerce or similar business associations. Previous bills referred to SBHPs as Association Health Plans (AHPs). The law also overrides many state consumer protection laws that apply to not only the small group health insurance marketplace but also to large group and individual insurance, including standards for how insurers handle claims and requirements that insurance plans cover cancer treatments or hospital stays after giving birth.

The Middle-Class Position: 

The Middle Class Opposes. Legislation that enabled small businesses to affordably provide quality health coverage to their employees would allow more Americans to enjoy a middle-class standard of living. Unfortunately, this bill does not accomplish that goal. Instead, it would downgrade the quality of health coverage millions of Americans currently have, while doing little to reduce costs. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that health insurance premiums for small businesses would decline just 2 to 3 percent as a result of this legislation, while one in four small businesses would actually pay higher premiums. At the same time, the exemptions from state insurance regulations would allow insurance companies to sell “junk insurance policies” that fail to provide adequate coverage of needed medical care. With an estimated 25 million Americans already underinsured, exemptions from state insurance laws that protect at least some Americans would result in a devastating loss of covered care. Preempting state insurance laws would also have other negative impacts on patients and health care providers: for example, it would block states from regulating insurance rates, overseeing how insurance companies handle customer complaints, and requiring prompt payment of claims.

From the Experts: 

“While small businesses want more affordable coverage, their employees
deserve coverage that’s worth something. No one would buy a car that’s inexpensive
because it’s missing its engine, transmission, breaks, wheels, seats, and doors. A health
insurance policy that leaves people uninsured for certain diseases, basic preventive care,
or events like pregnancy, is not real coverage.”

–Families USA (May 8, 2006)

“The American Cancer Society and many others have worked with state legislatures for years to
ensure that essential insurance coverage is extended to as many citizens as possible. In one
stroke, this bill would erase all that state legislatures have done to prevent and more effectively
treat cancer by ensuring access to life-saving screenings for breast, colon, and prostate cancer,
cancer specialists, coverage for evidence-based off-label prescription drug use, clinical trials, and
proven smoking cessation services. Passage of this legislation would represent a retreat in this nation’s commitment to defeat cancer.”

–Daniel E. Smith and Wendy K.D. Selig, The American Cancer Society (March 7, 2006)

Beyond this Bill: 

47 million Americans were uninsured in 2006, while an estimated 25 million were underinsured, paying premiums for coverage that was not sufficient to protect them from exorbitant medical expenses. Cutting back on state consumer protection relating to health insurance would solve neither of these problems. Instead, Congress should work towards a comprehensive plan of universal coverage, making sure every American has access to health care and neither small businesses nor employees are forced to bear high costs alone.

Maine New Hampshire Vermont Massachusetts Rhode Island Connecticut New York New Jersey Pennsylvania Delaware Maryland West Virginia North Carolina South Carolina Georgia Florida Alabama Mississippi Tennessee Virginia Kentucky Ohio Indiana Michigan Illinois Wisconsin Louisiana Arkansas Missouri Iowa Minnesota Oklahoma Kansas Nebraska South Dakota North Dakota Texas Colorado New Mexico Arizona Utah Wyoming Hawaii Alaska Montana Nevada Idaho California Oregon Washington